Business Ideas

Govt urges US regulator not to punish Satyam

India has requested the US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) not to impose any fine on Mahindra Satyam, formerly Satyam Computer Services Ltd (SCSL), as this will impede the new entity’s rehabilitation. - AOL to lay off one-third of its workforce - Intel to pay AMD $1.25 bn, settle all disputes - SEC shares info with CBI on Satyam scam probe - European Commission objects to $7.4 bn Sun-Oracle deal - Cognizant buys UBS captive unit for $75 mn - ADRs gain $11 bn in September The SEC has been probing the company, which is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), after founder-head Ramalinga Raju disclosed that his company’s accounts had been cooked for years. The scam, according to the Central Bureau of Information (CBI), could be to the tune of Rs 14,000 crore and not Rs 7,800 crore, as claimed by Raju initially. “(Mahindra) Satyam has been put back on its feet. The biggest jolt in the Satyam fraud was to the shareholders and if the SEC imposes a penalty, they will be impacted. It will be a setback to the company, which is in the process of being rehabilitated,” said Salman Khurshid, Union minister for corporate affairs. He was speaking at the sidelines of a conference at the Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management here.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):

News of the day
ONGC, partners to invest over Rs 46,000 cr in Iran
Oil and Natural Gas Corp (ONGC) and its partners will invest over Rs 46,000 crore (about $10 billion , based on current exchange rate) in two giant gas fields and an LNG project in Iran, Iranian Deputy Oil Minister Seifollah Jashnsaz said.
Popular Articles

AV Rajwade: The imminent food crisis
AV Rajwade / New Delhi December 28, 2009, 0:57 IST

Sebi well within rights to act against RIL: MCA
The government has said that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) was empowered to take action against Reliance Industries (RIL) if a probe established irregularities in share allotment by the company in 2000, and wanted to know what exactly the market regulator expected from it.